Fol. Biol. 2010, 56, 263-268
https://doi.org/10.14712/fb2010056060263
Dynamic Oxidoreductive Potential of Astringent Retraction Agents
References
1. 2006) Effects of different retraction medicaments on gingival tissue. Quintessence Int. 37, 53-59.
, E. A., Yldirim, E., Dalkiz, M., Yavuzyilmaz, H., Beydemir, B. (
2. 2008) A clinical study on the effects of cordless and conventional retraction techniques on the gingival and periodontal health. J. Clin. Periodontol. 3, 1053-1058.
< , K. Q., Azar, W. Z., Alwaeli, H. A., Said, K. N. (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01335.x>
3. 2005) SEMEDX Study of prepared human dentine surfaces exposed to gingival retraction fluids. J. Dent. 33, 731-739.
< , O. A., Driessen, D. H., Botha, A. J. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2005.02.002>
4. 1983) Comparative study of gingival retraction methods. J. Prosthet. Dent. 50, 561-565.
< , R., Tsao, T. F., Carranza, F. A., Kenney, E. B. (https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(83)90581-4>
5. 2008) Gingival retraction techniques for implants versus teeth. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 139, 1354-1363.
< , V., Schwass, D., Chandler, N. (https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0047>
6. 1986) Tissue displacement methods in fixed prosthodontics. J. Prosthet. Dent. 55, 175-181.
< , B. W., Bomberg, T. J., Hatch, R. A., Hoffman, W. Jr (https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(86)90336-7>
7. 1982) A comparison of gingival inflammation related to retraction cords. J. Prosthet. Dent. 47, 384-386.
< , G. G., Landesman, H. M., Calhoun, J. E., Martinoff, J. T. (https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(82)80085-1>
8. 1985) Review and survey of medicaments used with gingival retraction cords. J. Prosthet. Dent. 53, 525-531.
< , T. E., Gandara, B. K., Nemetz, H. (https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90640-7>
9. 1990) Saliva and dental health. Clinical implications of saliva: Report of a consensus meeting. Br. Dent. J. 169, 96-98.
< , W. M. (https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4807284>
10. 2006) The effect of gingival retraction procedures on periodontal indices and crevicular fluid cytokine levels: pilot study. J. Prosthodont. 15, 108-112.
< , J., Aboyoussef, H., Weiner, S., Singh, S., Jandinski, J. (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00083.x>
11. 1999) Current methods of finish-line exposure by practicing prosthodontist. J. Prosthodont. 8, 163-170.
< , P. A., Tira, D. A., Barlow, J. (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.1999.tb00031.x>
12. 2002a) Viability of fibroblasts in cell culture after treatment with different chemical retraction agents. J. Oral Rehab. 29, 98-104.
< , I., Batista, U., Cvetko, E., Marion, L. (https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00790.x>
13. 2002b) Gingival inflammatory response induced by chemical retraction agents in Beagle dogs. Int. J. Prosth. 15, 14-19.
, I., Cvetko, E., Marion, L. (
14. 2002c) Electron microscopic analysis of the effects of chemical retraction agents on cultured rat keratinocytes. J. Prosthet. Dent. 87, 51-56.
< , I., Sterle, M., Marion, L. (https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.119681>
15. 2007) Clinical evaluation of different gingival cords. Quintessence Int. 38, 92-98.
, O., User, A., Toksavul, S., Boyacioglu, H. (
16. 1994) Disturbance of the dentinal smear layer by acidic hemostatic agents. J. Prosthet. Dent. 72, 4-7.
< , M. F., Rosenstiel, S. F., Sandrik, J. L. (https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90207-0>
17. 1996) Smear layer instability caused by hemostatic agents. J. Prosthet. Dent. 76, 477-482.
< , M. F., Couri, C. C., Johnston, W. M. (https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90004-9>
18. 2004) Cytotoxic effects of gingival retraction cords on human gingival fibroblasts in vitro. J. Oral Rehab. 31, 368-372.
< , C., Huang, F., Yang, L., Chou, L., Chou, M., Chanh, Y. (https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01237.x>
19. 2004) Set up of in vitro methods able to detect the safety of astringent liquids. Minerva Stomatol. 53, 361-367.
, G., D’Abrosca, F., Fontana, P. (
20. 1983) Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytoxicity assays. J. Immunol. Meth. 65, 55-65.
< , T. (https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4>
21. 2002) Characterization of the differentiated antioxidant profile of human saliva. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 32, 268-277.
< , R. M., Klein, I., Zarzhewsky, N., Drigues, N., Reznick, A. (https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891-5849(01)00806-1>
22. 1984) Exposing the gingival margin: A systematic approach for the control of hemorrhage. J. Prosthet. Dent. 51, 647-651.
< , H., Donovan, T., Landesman, H. (https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(84)90410-4>
23. 2006a) Clinical and microscopic evaluation of retraction set Racécord Système®. Dent. Med. Probl. 43, 85-86. (in Polish)
, D., Panek, H., Bogucki, Z. A. (
24. 2006b) Gingival retraction – survey results of Polish dentists. Part 1. Method, materials and chemical retraction agents preferences. Protet. Stomatol. 56, 352-360. (in Polish)
, D., Panek, H., Nowakowska, M., Nowakowska, A. (
25. 2006c) Gingival retraction – survey results of Polish dentists. Part 2. Clinical habits related to retraction procedures. Protet. Stomatol. 56, 361-366. (in Polish)
, D., Panek, H., Nowakowska, M., and Nowakowska A (
26. 2007) Classification of retraction materials in the aspect of biocompatibility with gingival sulcus environment. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 16, 204-208.
, D., Panek, H. (
27. 2008) Classification of chemical retraction agents. Protet. Stomatol. 58, 202-208. (in Polish)
, D. (
28. 2009) The impact of retraction astringents on gingival margin tissues from literature review of in vivo studies. Protet. Stomatol. 59, 119-124. (in Polish)
, D. (
29. 2009) Evaluation of pH levels in gingival retraction agents. Protet. Stomatol. 59, 25-31.
, D., Raszewski, Z. (
30. Phillips, H. P (1973) Dye exclusion test for cell viability. In: Tissue Culture-Methods and Application eds. P. F. Kruse & M. K. Patterson, p. 406, Academic Press, New York.
31. 2008) A simple and established method of tissue culture of human gingival fibroblasts for gingival augmentation. Folia Histochem. Cytobiol. 46, 117-119.
< , J., Dominiak, M., Kulbacka, J., Chwiłkowska, A., Krawczykowska, H. (https://doi.org/10.2478/v10042-008-0017-4>
32. 1980) Impression materials used for cast restoration in eight states. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 5, 696-699.
< , H. T., Hatch, R. A., Keenan, M. P., Hemphill, M. W. (https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1980.0228>
33. 1984) Clinical effectiveness of mechanical-chemical tissue displacement methods. J. Prosthet. Dent. 51, 326-329.
< , D. J., Wiliams, E. H. (https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(84)90214-2>
34. 1993) Review of the pH of hemostatic agents used in tissue displacement. J. Prosthet. Dent. 70, 191-192.
< , R. D., Miller, A., Staffanou, R. S. (https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90018-J>
35. 2008) Influence of different retraction techniques on crevicular fluid flow. Int. J. Prosthodont. 21, 215-216.
, B., Rehman, P., Balkenhol, M. (