Fol. Biol. 2024, 70, 62-73
https://doi.org/10.14712/fb2024070010062
Parallel DNA/RNA NGS Using an Identical Target Enrichment Panel in the Analysis of Hereditary Cancer Predisposition
References
1. 2015) Functional classification of BRCA2 DNA variants by splicing assays in a large minigene with 9 exons. Hum. Mutat. 36, 210-221.
< , A., Hernandez-Moro, C., Curiel-Garcia, A. et al. (https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.22725>
2. 2019) SCANVIS: a tool for SCoring, ANnotating and VISualizing splice junctions. Bioinformatics 35, 4843-4845.
< , P., Geiger, H., Robine, N. (https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btz452>
3. 2019) Targeted RNA-seq successfully identifies normal and pathogenic splicing events in breast/ovarian cancer susceptibility and Lynch syndrome genes. Int. J. Cancer 145, 401-414.
< , R. D., Mensaert, K., López-Perolio, I. et al. (https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.32114>
4. 2016) From reads to genes to pathways: differential expression analysis of RNA-Seq experiments using Rsubread and the edgeR quasi-likelihood pipeline. F1000Res. 5, 1438.
, Y., Lun, A. T., Smyth, G. K. (
5. 2014) Comprehensive annotation of splice junctions supports pervasive alternative splicing at the BRCA1 locus: a report from the ENIGMA consortium. Hum. Mol. Genet. 23, 3666-3680.
< , M., Blok, M. J., Whiley, P. et al. (https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddu075>
6. 2023) Integrated analysis of genomic and transcriptomic data for the discovery of splice-associated variants in cancer. Nat. Commun. 14, 1589.
< , K. C., Feng, Y. Y., Ramu, A. et al. (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-37266-6>
7. 2020) Targeted RNA sequencing enhances gene expression profiling of ultra-low input samples. RNA Biol. 17, 1741-1753.
< , F., Handel, A. E., Attar, M. et al. (https://doi.org/10.1080/15476286.2020.1777768>
8. 2017) Detecting splicing patterns in genes involved in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 25, 1147-1154.
< , G., Rousselin, A., Goardon, N. et al. (https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2017.116>
9. 2022) Recommendations for reporting results of diagnostic genomic testing. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 30, 1011-1016.
< , Z. C., Ahn, J. W., Carreira, I. M. et al. (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-022-01091-0>
10. 2013) STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15-21.
< , A., Davis, C. A., Schlesinger, F. et al. (https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635>
11. 2016) Variants within TSC2 exons 25 and 31 are very unlikely to cause clinically diagnosable tuberous sclerosis. Hum. Mutat. 37, 364-370.
< , R., Nellist, M., Hoogeveen-Westerveld, M. et al. (https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.22951>
12. 2018) Quantitative analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline splicing variants using a novel RNA-massively parallel sequencing assay. Front. Oncol. 8, 286.
< , S., Hsuan, V., Wu, S. et al. (https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2018.00286>
13. 2016) Recommended extension of indication criteria for genetic testing of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome. Klin. Onkol. 29 (Suppl. 1), S9-S13. (in Czech)
< , L., Machackova, E., Palacova, M. et al. (https://doi.org/10.14735/amko2016S9>
14. 2015) Association of germline CHEK2 gene variants with risk and prognosis of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. PLoS One 10, e0140819.
< , O., Kleiblova, P., Hojny, J. et al. (https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140819>
15. 2022) Comprehensive quantitative analysis of alternative splicing variants reveals the HNF1B mRNA splicing pattern in various tumour and non-tumour tissues. Sci. Rep. 12, 199.
< , J., Michalkova, R., Krkavcova, E. et al. (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03989-z>
16. 2017) Multiplex PCR and NGS-based identification of mRNA splicing variants: analysis of BRCA1 splicing pattern as a model. Gene 637, 41-49.
< , J., Zemankova, P., Lhota, F. et al. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2017.09.025>
17. 2020) RNA sequencing: new technologies and applications in cancer research. J. Hematol. Oncol. 13, 166.
< , M., Tao, S., Zhang, L. et al. (https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-020-01005-x>
18. 2022) Low frequency of cancer-predisposition gene mutations in liver transplant candidates with hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 15, 201.
< , K., Frankova, S., Zemankova, P. et al. (https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15010201>
19. 2022) Mutational and splicing landscape in a cohort of 43,000 patients tested for hereditary cancer. NPJ Genom. Med. 7, 49.
< , C., Cass, A., Conner, B. R. et al. (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41525-022-00323-y>
20. 2024) Diagnostic outcomes of concurrent DNA and RNA sequencing in individuals undergoing hereditary cancer testing. JAMA Oncol. 10, 212-219.
< , C., Hoang, L., Zimmermann, H. et al. (https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.5586>
21. 2012) Guidelines for splicing analysis in molecular diagnosis derived from a set of 327 combined in silico/in vitro studies on BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants. Hum. Mutat. 33, 1228-1238.
< , C., Caux-Moncoutier, V., Krieger, S. et al. (https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.22101>
22. 2021) Nucleotides in both donor and acceptor splice sites are responsible for choice in NAGNAG tandem splice sites. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 78, 6979-6993.
< , P., Soucek, P., Radova, L. et al. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-021-03943-2>
23. 2020) Detecting sample swaps in diverse NGS data types using linkage disequilibrium. Nat. Commun. 11, 3697.
< , N., Farjoun, Y., Fennell, T. J. et al. (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17453-5>
24. 2020) RNA-seq analysis is a useful tool in variant classification. JCO Precis. Oncol. 4, 1226-1227.
< , R., LaDuca, H., Richardson, M. E. et al. (https://doi.org/10.1200/PO.20.00310>
25. 2016) Women at high risk of breast cancer: molecular characteristics, clinical presentation and management. Breast 28, 136-144.
< , Z., Kristensen, V. N. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2016.05.006>
26. 2019) Identification of deleterious germline CHEK2 mutations and their association with breast and ovarian cancer. Int. J. Cancer 145, 1782-1797.
< , P., Stolarova, L., Krizova, K. et al. (https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.32385>
27. 2023) Germline multigene panel testing of patients with endometrial cancer. Oncol. Lett. 25, 216.
< , J., Jelinkova, S., Zemankova, P. et al. (https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2023.13802>
28. 2017) Gene panel sequencing in familial breast/ovarian cancer patients identifies multiple novel mutations also in genes others than BRCA1/2. Int. J. Cancer 140, 95-102.
< , C., Hoyer, J., Vasileiou, G. et al. (https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.30428>
29. 2023) Germline-focused analysis of tumour-detected variants in 49,264 cancer patients: ESMO Precision Medicine Working Group recommendations. Ann. Oncol. 34, 215-227.
< , Z., Bandlamudi, C., Loveday, C. et al. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2022.12.003>
30. 2020) A clinical guide to hereditary cancer panel testing: evaluation of gene-specific cancer associations and sensitivity of genetic testing criteria in a cohort of 165,000 high-risk patients. Genet. Med. 22, 407-415.
< , H., Polley, E. C., Yussuf, A. et al. (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-019-0633-8>
31. 2018) Investigation of experimental factors that underlie BRCA1/2 mRNA isoform expression variation: recommendations for utilizing targeted RNA sequencing to evaluate potential spliceogenic variants. Front. Oncol. 8, 140.
< , V. L., Pearson, J. F., Currie, M. J. et al. (https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2018.00140>
32. 2019) Quantifying BRCA1 and BRCA2 mRNA isoform expression levels in single cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 693.
< , V. L., Pearson, J. F., Morley-Bunker, A. E. et al. (https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20030693>
33. 2020) SpliceLauncher: a tool for detection, annotation and relative quantification of alternative junctions from RNAseq data. Bioinformatics 36, 1634-1636.
< , R., Harter, V., Atkinson, A. et al. (https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btz784>
34. 2016) Hereditary truncating mutations of DNA repair and other genes in BRCA1/BRCA2/PALB2-negatively tested breast cancer patients. Clin. Genet. 90, 324-333.
< , F., Zemankova, P., Kleiblova, P. et al. (https://doi.org/10.1111/cge.12748>
35. 2020) Multigene panel germline testing of 1333 Czech patients with ovarian cancer. Cancers (Basel) 12, 956.
< , K., Stolarova, L., Zemankova, P. et al. (https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12040956>
36. 2019) Alternative splicing and ACMG-AMP-2015-based classification of PALB2 genetic variants: an ENIGMA report. J. Med. Genet. 56, 453-460.
< , I., Leman, R., Behar, R. et al. (https://doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2018-105834>
37. 2019) Twenty years of BRCA1 and BRCA2 molecular analysis at MMCI – current developments for the classification of variants. Klin. Onkol. 32 (Suppl. 2), 51-71.
< , E., Claes, K., Mikova, M. et al. (https://doi.org/10.14735/amko2019S51>
38. 2012) Differential expression analysis of multifactor RNA-Seq experiments with respect to biological variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 4288-4297.
< , D. J., Chen, Y., Smyth, G. K. (https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks042>
39. 2010) The genome analysis toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 20, 1297-1303.
< , A., Hanna, M., Banks, E. et al. (https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.107524.110>
40. 2021) Role of splicing regulatory elements and in silico tools usage in the identification of deep intronic splicing variants in hereditary breast/ovarian cancer genes. Cancers (Basel) 13, 3341.
< , A., Domenech-Vivo, J., Tenes, A. et al. (https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13133341>
41. 2003) Mutations of the BRCA1 gene in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in the Czech Republic. Med. Princ. Pract. 12, 23-29.
< , P., Stribrna, J., Kleibl, Z. et al. (https://doi.org/10.1159/000068163>
42. 2014) Realizing the promise of cancer predisposition genes. Nature 505, 302-308.
< , N. (https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12981>
43. 2015) Alternative splicing signatures in RNA-seq data: percent spliced in (PSI). Curr. Protoc. Hum. Genet. 87, 11.16.1-11.16.14.
, S., Miao, K., Benson, C. C. et al. (
44. 2018) Validation of CZECANCA (CZEch CAncer paNel for Clinical Application) for targeted NGS-based analysis of hereditary cancer syndromes. PLoS One 13, e0195761.
< , J., Zemankova, P., Lhotova, K. et al. (https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195761>
45. 2021) Therapeutic implications of germline testing in patients with advanced cancers. J. Clin. Oncol. 39, 2698-2709.
< , Z. K., Maio, A., Chakravarty, D. et al. (https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.03661>
46. 2023) A comprehensive molecular analysis of 113 primary ovarian clear cell carcinomas reveals common therapeutically significant aberrations. Diagn. Pathol. 18, 72.
< , I., Hajkova, N., Hojny, J. et al. (https://doi.org/10.1186/s13000-023-01358-0>
47. 2021) Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 71, 209-249.
< , H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R. L. et al. (https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660>
48. 2015) It’s a bit over, is that ok? The subtle surplus from tandem alternative splicing. RNA Biol. 12, 115-122.
< , K., Kramer, M. (https://doi.org/10.1080/15476286.2015.1017210>
49. 2023) Using the ACMG/AMP framework to capture evidence related to predicted and observed impact on splicing: recommendations from the ClinGen SVI splicing subgroup. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 110, 1046-1067.
< , L. C., Hoya, M., Wiggins, G. A. R. et al. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2023.06.002>
50. 2019) Comprehensive assessment of BARD1 messenger ribonucleic acid splicing with implications for variant classification. Front. Genet. 10, 1139.
< , L. C., Lattimore, V. L., Kvist, A. et al. (https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.01139>
51. 2021) Prevalence of germline pathogenic variants in cancer predisposing genes in Czech and Belgian pancreatic cancer patients. Cancers (Basel) 13, 4430.
< , G., Kral, J., Rosseel, T. et al. (https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13174430>
52. 2017) Gene dispersion is the key determinant of the read count bias in differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data. BMC Genomics 18, 408.
< , S., Nam, D. (https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-3809-0>
53. 2012) A high-performance computing toolset for relatedness and principal component analysis of SNP data. Bioinformatics 28, 3326-3328.
< , X., Levine, D., Shen, J. et al. (https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts606>